|
nbarker
|
|
New Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 04/01/08
|
|
Posts: 21
|
|
Loc: western NY
|
|
Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
04/10/08 09:02 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Does such a vehicle exist (LOL)? Honestly, I know that 4WDs are not as fuel efficient as FWD. However, our new place has a long, steep driveway and I need something that would be able to get up it in the event of snow that hadn't been plowed yet. I am thinking about one of the following: Subaru Outback Toyota Rav-4 Honda CR-V
Does anyone have any experience with any of these vehicles? Do you have any other recommendations that I didn't think of? I need something that I'd easily be able to put a car seat in and probably 2 car seats (once we have #2 in a couple of years).
Thanks... Nicole
Live....Laugh....Love....Learn
Post Extras:
|
|
Bird
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/12/02
|
|
Posts: 1678
|
|
Loc: Corinth, TX, USA
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: nbarker]
04/10/08 03:36 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
The only 4WD I've personally owned was a Suzuki Samurai, but my wife has a brother in the northwest corner of West Virginia and both he and his wife drive Subarus. I think she drives an Outback and he drives a Tribeca. The summer I worked in my brother's tire dealership in Anchorage, I found the Subaru to be pretty popular up there. And from what I've seen and heard, I think if I lived in an area that got much snow and ice, I'd probably have to buy a Subaru.
Post Extras:
|
|
CJDave
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/21/02
|
|
Posts: 851
|
|
Loc: Southeast Iowa
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: nbarker]
04/10/08 06:39 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
You DO realize that you have asked one of the three "unaskable" questions; you DO know that, don't you? You NEVER ask what brand of oil someone might recommend, what brand of SUV to buy, or what political candidate to support. HOWEVER, now that you HAVE recklessly broken the glass, you might as well sit back and read the responses; whacked out though they may be. *** In 1997 we moved from the flat topography of the Central Valley of CA to the Gold Rush Country of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Our home was at 4500 Ft in the snowy reaches of the Sonora Pass vacationland. Not only does it snow like mad up there, but there is NO LEVEL GROUND. Downhill hairpin turns in snow can be treacherous, ....UNLESS..... you are driving ALL FOUR SPOTS. And it goes even further than that,.... you have to drive all four spots AS REQUIRED, that is every wheel can go a different speed if needed. To DO THAT, you need a center differential in the transfer case, not merely yoked up four wheel drive. Yoked up FWD makes you go straight in the downhill corners....BAD ....and in 2WD, the rear axle gets to the corner before YOU do, ...ALSO BAD . The answer is a vehicle which has full-time, open-center, FWD (Subaru has a great system) which can be "yoked up" as needed for pushing through really deep snow. We bought a new Jeep Grand Cherokee in 1997. It took me three weeks of poring over the literature to spec it out, but what a machine it has been! It now has 218,000 miles on it and I JUST NOW laid the first wrench on the engine (I had to replace the water pump because the seal was leaking). When I spec'd it out, I left off everything that was heavy and unnecessary like the skid plates; which are only needed in rock climbing and which keep vital cooling air off the gearboxes; and the V8 engine which added 200+ pounds to the front axle. With the 4.0 inline six, the Jeep has plenty of power and gets, ........24-26 MPG..... WITH air conditioning. I ordered the highest axle gear available so my RPM at 60 is only 1750. The transmission is three speeds plus a 25% overdrive and the transfer case has 4WD (lock) 4WD (open center) and 2WD, all selectable by a LEVER, not a troublesome push button. If I am expecting bad weather I make it a point to fill the fuel tank which gets my vehicle weight very close to 50-50 front-to-rear. More times that I can count, I have followed drivers of me-too SUV's up twisty, snowy roads; witnessing their monumental struggles to stay on the road and keep moving foreward; while I calmly drove my Jeep in 4WD (open) and sipped a mocha. If I couldn't have a Jeep, I would have a Subaru because of their good balance, their good ground clearance, and the open center FWD.
CJDave
Post Extras:
|
|
jimbrown
|
|
Gold Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 08/06/04
|
|
Posts: 376
|
|
Loc: Tombstone, AZ
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: CJDave]
04/10/08 07:36 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Boy Dave i'm with you. I had a 97 Grand Cherokee that must have been very similar to yours. I drove it all over Europe, Alps and all it was great. At that time jeeps were the most stolen vehicle in Europe. They got wisk away to Bosnia and the like in hours. Just like F250's do to Mexico.
I traded it only because I really needed a truck and the Jeep could not carry the loads that I needed.
I currently have all 4x4 vehicles, a wrangler ( I love it), an Avalanche ( my 2n'd one) great 4x4 the 03 was better than my new 07. and an F250 power stroke ( hauls the mail no matter how heavy everywhere) rides like heck. But i think if you only gonna have one 4x4 it ought a be a jeep.
I was on a safari in Tanzania and our guide had us in a land rover. He ask what kinda car I had I told him a jeep. He was jealous. His comments were that land rovers were good but needed careful driving but that anyone could drive a jeep and never brake it.
Edited by jimbrown (04/10/08 07:39 PM)
Post Extras:
|
|
CJDave
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/21/02
|
|
Posts: 851
|
|
Loc: Southeast Iowa
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: jimbrown]
04/10/08 08:35 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
We have a '79 CJ-7 with a modified Quadra-Trac drive that I call Quadra-Snow drive; I machined the bias clutches out of the barrel differential in the transfer case. We have a '99 Wrangler that I WISH had the 242 treansfer case instead of the 231 (maybe someday we'll do a transplant). We have an '80 GM K20 pickup with the knock-down drag-out SM465/NP205 geartrain and the 14-bolt floater in the rear. Jeepchick drives her Wrangler everywhere and is madly in love with it. Those new coil spring Jeeps are really a huge improvement over the leafers.
CJDave
Post Extras:
|
|
Pat
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/15/02
|
|
Posts: 4889
|
|
Loc: SouthCentral Oklahoma
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: CJDave]
04/12/08 11:53 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
I have not driven the new CR-V but a couple years back when they looked boxier they were terrific in snow. They have a viscous disk power transfer device that engages automatically when the regular drive wheels go faster than the normally coasting wheels. It is not mechanical so it doesn't go clunk. It is very smooth and engages in a fraction of a second. We got to drive for a week in ice and snow. Great little car.
The Subaru all wheel drive is very refined and able but its mileage has been a bit low for my tastes. I almost bought one but opted for a Toyota Prius, as a good front wheel drive with computer stability and traction control is nearly as good as 4wd and we typically get in the 40's with best tank being 52.8 MPG.
Prius is NOT recommended by me for serious hills in ice and snow.
Maybe a Hybrid SUV will get you both the mileage and traction you need. I haven't kept up with who has what but a Hybrid Highlander might be worth test driving.
Here is info for Ford's hybrid Escape.
http://4wheeldrive.about.com/cs/escape/a/00041903a.htm
Pat
"I'm not from your planet, monkey boy!"
Edited by Pat (04/12/08 12:00 PM)
Post Extras:
|
|
CJDave
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/21/02
|
|
Posts: 851
|
|
Loc: Southeast Iowa
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: Pat]
04/12/08 02:22 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Jeep tried the viscous coupling in the Grand Cherokee models that were made in the very late nineties. I have YET to hear a good word about them because like so many vehicle drive systems that seek to remove all decisions from the driver, they can't cover all eventualities. It is just as important to have all four spots engaged when you are SLOWING as it is when you are PULLING, and that's where ninety precent of the systems are lacking. The idea that there would be an opportunity for torque-initiated engagement is fine for deep sand, but what about ice? In the absence of a system which has four electric hub motors all speed-controlled by a central computer with dynamic braking capability; I still think....heck contend..... that a lever-operated open center/closed center transfer case beats anything else that there is. They use those same NV242 cases in the Hummer, just with a heavier chain on the main drive. I get a kick outa seeing those liddle me-too SUVeezz driving around which have the exposed half-shafts in the rear. I wonder if anyone has ever wound up about a hundred feet of old telegraph wire or a mass of berry vines around one of those natural "weeders". Off-Road? I don't THINK so; not with that setup.
CJDave
Post Extras:
|
|
Pat
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/15/02
|
|
Posts: 4889
|
|
Loc: SouthCentral Oklahoma
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: CJDave]
04/14/08 08:59 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Well, OK, Dave. I have no "problem with manually shifted type xfer cases starting with my 1943 Ford Jeep and my Corn Binder.
As there are differing requirements for different users. The "best" or even "which is good enough" also varies. The CR-V thingy was supposed to lock up well within a fraction of a revolution of a rear wheel from a front if the difference velocity was sufficient. I don't see how this would not also work in deceleration.
It offered a simple user interface (you didn't have to do anything so a less experienced or less competent user couldn't make a mistake or bad choice.) I drove it on ice and over snow on dirt and gravel roads as well as pavement and it worked well.
Sometimes the really knowledgeable gear head forgets that not every application requires or is even best served by the ULTIMATE system.
It isn't always about which is the ultimate system but is sometimes what is good enough or even what is best for a given (and perhaps limited) set of requirements.
I wasn't suggesting it be adopted for use in a main battle tank, a Duce, or Hummer...
Pat
"I'm not from your planet, monkey boy!"
Post Extras:
|
|
CJDave
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/21/02
|
|
Posts: 851
|
|
Loc: Southeast Iowa
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: Pat]
04/14/08 11:23 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
ERK! It's the same old thing, Pat; someone asks me for the time and I find it necessary to give them a dissertation on how to build a good clock. You HAVE hit the mark on one point, the average user of a FWD vehicle has NO IDEA what is under the floor OR how it works, OR how to use it. Very few people could tell you the difference between All-Wheel Drive and Four Wheel Drive as the systems are often labeled. I once witnessed an arguement between a guy with a Jeep Regular Cherokee and a bystander. The Jeep guy argued that he had all wheel drive; and the bystander said he didn't. From ten feet away I could see the straight tube front axle in that rare, 2WD Cherokee. That was a real head-shaker.
CJDave
Post Extras:
|
|
Pat
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/15/02
|
|
Posts: 4889
|
|
Loc: SouthCentral Oklahoma
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: CJDave]
04/15/08 08:53 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
How to make a good clock!!! I usually don't stop there but throw in some history of Horology and the British Crown's prize for a nautical chronometer (as we discussed previously.)
All wheel drive??? Yeah, what's your problem, he was driving on all 4 wheels wasn't he?
If we stop to rant on every tech topic that the ordinary user misunderstands or has no clue about we will not have time for all the rants much less anything else. Consider all the folks using microwave ovens and then consider how many actually understand how it works, even the energy transfer mechanism if not the microwave generation and distribution.
High bypass turbines. Anti-lock brakes, Computer stability enhancement (automotive.) Fly by wire. TV. DVD/CD reading and writing. How the internet actually works at the bit and byte level. Packet communications in general. Fuel cells, solar electric panels. Stuff that people toss around in common conversation that they have little or no understanding of and couldn't describe adequately to explain it to anyone.
When gravity being directed mostly vertically downward (in most people's personal experience) is the upper limit of their understanding of physics and a large portion of the population thinks humans and dinosaurs cohabited the planet (until the great flood drowned the dinos) and... arghhhhh, I better quit before I incite a riot and get burned at the stake.
A computer is an information manipulation appliance. Using it fairly well does not require understanding the underlying technology or the physics of the manufacture of high density chips. Similarly, to be "good enough" a driver does not require much knowledge of the ICE or underlying mechanical technology of power transmission.
Most people who can discern that driving screws is better done with a screwdriver than a hammer can learn to use whatever version of AWD/4wd they have sufficiently well such that they will not harm the equipment very much or often and may profit from its use.
Any technology, sufficiently advanced, is indistinguishable from magic.
At some point people have been exposed to so much "magic" beyond their ken that they are essentially numbed by it and no longer are able to appropriately rightly divine the real from the imagined and tend to equivocate all tech above and beyond them.
Patr
Pat
"I'm not from your planet, monkey boy!"
Edited by Pat (04/15/08 09:19 AM)
Post Extras:
|
|
Bird
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/12/02
|
|
Posts: 1678
|
|
Loc: Corinth, TX, USA
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: Pat]
04/15/08 10:30 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
In reply to:
Any technology, sufficiently advanced, is indistinguishable from magic.
At some point people have been exposed to so much "magic" beyond their ken that they are essentially numbed by it and no longer are able to appropriately rightly divine the real from the imagined and tend to equivocate all tech above and beyond them.
I think you're gettin' personal and talking about me now.
Post Extras:
|
|
egon
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/12/02
|
|
Posts: 3011
|
|
Loc: Nova Scotia,Canada
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: Pat]
04/15/08 02:20 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Okay; now tell me how these electrical anti corrosion systems for vehicles work!
Egon
Post Extras:
|
|
egon
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/12/02
|
|
Posts: 3011
|
|
Loc: Nova Scotia,Canada
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: egon]
04/16/08 05:19 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
The anti corrosion is a real question as a person I know has just purchased a vehicle with one on it.
I can understand the very basics of cathodic protection but this car system has me flummoxed!
Google didn't help me much.
Egon
Post Extras:
|
|
nbarker
|
|
New Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 04/01/08
|
|
Posts: 21
|
|
Loc: western NY
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: egon]
04/16/08 10:58 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Thank you all for your replies.... We are going to test drive the vehicles that I mentioned and then go from there. We need to save up a little bit before we buy, since the closing costs on this new house are almost emptying the bank account! (not to mention the JD tractor that my husband just purchased to maintain the property!)
Live....Laugh....Love....Learn
Post Extras:
|
|
Pat
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/15/02
|
|
Posts: 4889
|
|
Loc: SouthCentral Oklahoma
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: egon]
04/16/08 12:14 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Egon, Review the previous posts in this thread that discuss technology ==> magic and the hrair limit. I think you are in for a voyage of self discovery unless or until Dave weighs in with a detailed explanation not unlike his recent tome on 4x4.
Regarding the actual topic of this thread...
Hybrids may be a reasonable consideration for good reasons which may include but not be limited to GREEN and fuel economy.
Pat
"I'm not from your planet, monkey boy!"
Post Extras:
|
|
CJDave
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/21/02
|
|
Posts: 851
|
|
Loc: Southeast Iowa
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: Pat]
04/16/08 08:26 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
I was wondering what the weight of the on-board batteries in a hybrid might be? Since we all know that weight is the enemy of performance, how does that extra baggage reconcile with with economy, AND....here is the REAL question.....is anyone actually MEASURING wire-to-wheel efficiency, ie., comparing the watt-hrs taken from the outdoor 110V receptacle in the driveway to the miles traveled to and from the ice cream store, and equating THAT to input HP and then figuring back to an equivalent MPG? Are the hybrids getting a "pass" on the true economy issue because nobody knows how to figure it? Do they just ASSUME they get more bang for their buck?
CJDave
Post Extras:
|
|
CJDave
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/21/02
|
|
Posts: 851
|
|
Loc: Southeast Iowa
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: Pat]
04/16/08 08:51 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
I have wondered for quite a while when the car companies might try some kind of anti-corrosion system. The BIG problem here in the Midwest is that the SUMMER CORROSION is not usually caused by electrolysis, but by road dust that collects in little fissures and cavities and when wetted by subsequent rainstorms, releases the corrosive qualities of the dust. Certain types of aggregate that are used on unpaved roads promote very aggressive corrosion when dissolved in water. Of course the salt and ice-melt is the WINTER CORROSION agent and THAT might be much more easily offset by some sort of tricky on-board anti-electrolysis system, since it is not caused by dust but direct contact by a corrosive liquid. Those of you who were around in da fifties probably remember the tire industry's first foray into nylon tires. For some reason, the static electricity was very high and the auto mfg's added little commutators to each brake drum to provide a path for the current from the wheels to the chassis, and then drained it away with a ground strap. When we bought our new, '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee, it had a terrible static electricity problem. I was afraid that I would blow up a service station someday when I got out of the vehicle, so I finally installed a ground strap. Once the original tires were worn out and we installed a new set, the problem went away.
CJDave
Post Extras:
|
|
CJDave
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/21/02
|
|
Posts: 851
|
|
Loc: Southeast Iowa
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: nbarker]
04/16/08 09:07 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Take my word for it, Nicole, there is nothing quite as nice as sliding that big door open and seeing a green and yellow John Deere tractor sitting there in the shed. We have two John Deeres; one is a 1952 Model "A" with a Number 45 front end loader on it, and the other is a 2006 Model X300 lawn mower tractor. When I'm not busy writing tractor stories I help my neighbor harvest corn, and when I work for him, my "daily driver" is a 230 HP John Deere Model 8410. Sure, I love the "pleasant mechanical presence" of my 1952 Poppin' Johnny; it takes me back to my kidhood; but when a cold wind is blowing or it's 90 degrees and humid outside, the air conditioned cab on that big 8410 is sure nice.
CJDave
Post Extras:
|
|
egon
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/12/02
|
|
Posts: 3011
|
|
Loc: Nova Scotia,Canada
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: CJDave]
04/17/08 05:34 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
What confuses me is that the vehicles come with an on board device that sends a DC current. Namely the battery, either negative or positive ground that utilizes the car body and frame for current conduction just to make the regular electric systems of the vehicle work??
Egon
Post Extras:
|
|
Pat
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/15/02
|
|
Posts: 4889
|
|
Loc: SouthCentral Oklahoma
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: CJDave]
04/17/08 09:56 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Gee, Dave, you sure sound like you have a couple dull axes.
All of your concerns and others have been cussed, discussed, calculated, approximated, and estimated till the stats guys hyperventilated.
The outdoor outlet is not necessarily in the equation. I have a 2004 Toyota Prius, which I am sure you will agree is a gas electric hybrid. I say again HYBRID... NOT an electric car! It has no place to plug it in, not that a larger battery and a place to plug it in wouldn't be useful for some users in some situations.
My best mileage over a tank (not just coasting down a large hill one time) driving the speed limit or a bit more with the A/C on in town and highway mixed was 52.8 MPG. That is NOT our typical tank. My wife gets in the low 40's and I get in the higher 40's so we average about 44MPG (as reported by Consumer's Union in their magazine Consumer Reports.)
By the way for anyone who doesn't know... The Prius (has seatbelts for 5) seats 4 full sized adults well. I am 6'2" and weigh 250LBS. When I adjust the drivers seat to fit me I can then get in the back seat behind the drivers seat and my knees don't even come close to touching the back of the front seat although rear seat headroom is a bit cramped for me. It is a 5 door hatchback with ample storage. The rear seats fold (separately) for truly cavernous cargo space and it comes with tie down points and cargo net.
The battery in the Prius is under the back seat and is not that huge. It is NOT intended to be driven far on electricity alone but folks have modified them to lock out the ICE and go pure electric for short periods (standard feature in vehicles not imported to USA.)
I have extensively looked at Honda vs Toyota and feel that Toyota has much better technology and a superior approach. They have licensed their Hybrid Synergy drive to other manufacturers. (Ford I think)
I have not investigated Ford or other domestic Hybrids. I dwelled on Toyota because: 1. I think it is the best hybrid system available now, 2. I have one and can attest to the quality of its programing (a very important part of the mix of hardware and software.) I feel qualified to judge their software due to my MS in Software Engineering and years of experience. Not to grind it too fine but SOFTWARE is more important to a hybrid than it is even to the normal computerized automotive systems (which as you know are pretty deep into computer control.)
Toyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive, coupled with some of their mechanical innovations, is really quite elegant and just plain works well. I only have 35,000 miles on our Prius but a friend was so impressed with ours that he bought a 2005 and he has well over 100,000 on it and is still pleased as punch.
OK, that is my pitch for the boys at Toyota understanding how to make a good hybrid.
If I had concerns in some or all of the following categories: GREEN, current cost per mile to operate, trend line of gasoline prices, delay waiting for conveniently located hydrogen fuel stops, and similar then I would be at least looking at all the available Hybrid SUV offerings from the major manufacturers like Toyota, Ford, etc. if I wanted to find the vehicle that would provide the lowest cost per operational mile (not just mileage) while offering at least the minimum subset of capabilities I needed.
It is unreasonable to expect gasoline will drop to $2/gal. It is much more likely to reach $5/gal. Alternative fuels such as corn based ethanol are a short term stop gap passion play and will not stand the test of time. Other processes using other feed stocks will come to the fore but will still have the ICE as the target consumer. If you are going to run an ICE (gasoline or equivalent or diesel) it is more economical to go hybrid in the range of vehicles for the average family(sedan, SUV.) (Not talking long haul truckers, or replacing a Cumins-Dodge or Ford PS, or ...)
Now then Dave, since you apparently want to discuss electric vehicles or at least hybrids with a plug-in, lets do it.
Economy of scale and load leveling will let the power plant burn fuel more economically and cleaner than an ICE. Enough so that the electrical equivalent of xx gal of gas can be delivered to your electrical outlet cheaper than you can fill up at current prices and especially at the prices you will see in a couple years.
Then there are the considerations for energy storage and conversion, i.e. batteries and motors. Electric motors have excellent characteristics for variable demand applications such as automotive use, high efficiency and easy regulation over the full range of speeds. The bone of contention, I think you will agree, is mostly in the batteries and to a lesser degree wheel costs for delivery of electricity to your outlet.
Currently you can buy the equivalent of a tank of gasoline as electricity delivered to your garage cheaper than buying the gasoline. This will be even more so as gasoline prices continue to increase much faster than electricity.
In my opinion affordable electric cars for the masses are not here yet and the single worst stumbling block is batteries and their various problems, especially energy density. Long range electric cars are like chemical rockets. The rocket is mostly fuel and the car would be mostly batteries (with todays technology.)
While a fascinating topic, electric cars are not particularly related to the topic of this thread. Gasoline electric hybrid (or when available, diesel electric hybrid) vehicles do fall under "Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle" and at least one of us thinks they are a viable alternative or should at least be considered before making a final selection.
This presumes that the decision will be an informed decision giving weight to life cycle costs and not just the color of the interior. You need to consider many things besides the purchase price. You need to get realistic estimates of all costs over the life of the vehicle including insurance, tires, fuel, regular maint and if available (check with Consumer Reports) an idea of how trouble free that model has been if it has been out over a year) Then you can compare cost of ownership for 5 or how ever many years which does not necessarily follow the purchase price. Sometimes a more expensive car is cheaper to own for 5 or more years than a more cheaply priced one.
Pat
"I'm not from your planet, monkey boy!"
Edited by Pat (04/17/08 10:03 AM)
Post Extras:
|
|
CJDave
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/21/02
|
|
Posts: 851
|
|
Loc: Southeast Iowa
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: Pat]
04/17/08 06:11 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Er...... ah, ....; somehow in all of the hoopla I must have missed the definition. I was thinking that a HYBRID car was one that you could plug in and recharge, and only used the ICE for those times when the batteries were on their butt. That is obviously an error on my part. So, .... where does the electric current for the battery in a hybrid come from? Is it like a diesel electric submarine where you can (1) drive on ICE, (2) drive AND charge the accumulator, or (3) drive on electric power only? So is this right; the only source of motive power is the ICE either direct or thru the DC motor? With gasoline prices the way they are, wouldn't it be advantageous to PLUG IN the Hybrid to the driveway outlet and get all you could into those batteries using utility power? An additional savings could be gleaned by using a camo-colored extension cord, ....YES, they HAVE them, can you believe it!, ...... and slipping it under the fence and into the neighbor's back yard and plugging into their BB-Q rotissere outlet.
CJDave
Post Extras:
|
|
Pat
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/15/02
|
|
Posts: 4889
|
|
Loc: SouthCentral Oklahoma
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: CJDave]
04/18/08 10:28 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Not to worry Dave. The rules committee met and voted to NOT recall your secret decoder ring and drum you out of the corps.
There are different "styles" of ICE-electric hybrids. I personally think the type in the Prius is the best for its application.
Toyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive as used in the Prius is essentially a computer controlled "drive by wire" system. It has a small ICE (gasoline but could just as well be a diesel and even better) and motor generators. It has a planetary gear set which acts like a CVT. The transmission has no reverse. reverse is accomplished totally by electric motor. The tranny does not have a set of ratios to shift through and is continuously variable under computer control.
The engine is designed to be stopped and started frequently with no deleterious effect. The engine has computer controlled valves.
Here is the engine start sceanario: the computer opens the valves, shuts down fueling and shuts off the spark. Then using a large motor not a little starter motor, spins up the engine to operating RPM and gets oil pressure up and circulating. Then the computer puts the valves in run position and turns on the fuel and spark and the engine is just running (no traditional cranking.)
This is a low stress and wear start and is hardly felt (you really have to pay attention) by passengers.
The ICE is likely to be started up by the computer when it is cold to get it warm. At startup the fuel/air induction system is preheated by a well insulated thermos bottle of hot water which was stored at the preceding shutdown. This helps with fuel vaporization and reduces waste and emissions.
Depending on various factors, some of which are: engine temp, demand, state of battery charge, and the like, the computer may propel the vehicle solely by ICE, solely by electric motor or any proportion of the two in concert. This is performed seamlessly by the computer and is not a driver concern. An alert and observant driver may, through their inputs, influence the computers decisions. An example is: Accelerate modestly from a stop and you may delay the ICE startup for a varying period of time depending on your demand, state of charge etc. You may cruise at 45 MPH for a while on electric only or the ICE may be started within the first few feet of a start from a stop (especially if you start off briskly which will probably use ICE and electric together. The Prius is no "slot car" but if you lead foot it you may be surprised by the rapidity with which it pulls away from a full stop and tops 100MPH. If you are on poor traction it will use computer traction control to prevent excess wheel spin and computer stability control to steer around a corner while accelerating or decelerating with poor traction (even ice or snow.) If you don't try to violate the laws of physics the car will let you steer around a corner on ice while accelerating or decelerating. You can even just stomp the brake and just steer and the computer will do all that is possible within the laws of physics to make the maneuver work.
You get a computer controlled seamlessly integrated proportioning of electric and ICE propulsion (excepting reverse) and although you and I, Dave, would be thinking about all this stuff a lot, it is not required for the driver to know it is a hybrid. Put gas in the tank, press the break pedal and touch the Start button (keyless ignition and security) and shift the dash control lever (electric switch) to R or D and go for it. There is a "B" position on the shifter. This is for engine braking and is reserved for steep downgrades. You have to love those computer controlled valves (holy jake brake batman) Ok, just kidding, maybe not full on Jake Brakes but effective engine braking.
As regular gas cars "back drag" (engine braking) when you take your foot off the accelerator, the Prius is programmed to bias a motor generator to extract as much kinetic energy as a normal car does with engine braking. So in traffic when the car ahead coasts and you take youir foot off the accelerator, you coast down at about the same rate and don't get the FREE WHEELING feel. This energy used up by spinning a motor generator is used to charge your battery. You may get to "recycle" this energy when you next accelerate.
The EPA estimates for the Prius MPG are larger for in town than on highway, the reverse of a "standard vehicle." In town driving you use your brakes a lot and travel mostly at moderate (low aerodynamic drag) speeds. If you use your brakes moderately and not always race to a stop and then slam on the brakes, the actual friction brakes (disk rotors and pads) aren't applied. The deceleration commanded by brake pedal force is generated by regenerative braking by spinning a motor-generator. You get to recycle that energy. With steady but not heavy braking the transition from regenerative braking to friction brakes is between 6-7 MPH and again you have to be super alert to feel it happen. In a panic stop you will get regenerative braking plus friction brakes controlled by an anti-lock system. Again, the driver really doesn't need to know or think about any of this.
Just consider any sufficiently advanced technology is magic and the driver can just think the car magically does what it has to do to git 'er done.
The short version: Yes a Prius is in many ways like a diesel electric submarine.
Dave with your interests and comprehension you would probably be fascinated with some info available on the web about the Prius. Everyone asks about THE BATTERY. There are two, one is a little 12 volt lead acid automotive type for all the 12 volt accessories and lights and the other is the BIGUN. The bigun is warranted for 100,000 miles (California gets significantly more warranty) and is built in clusters (modules) of cells which are independently replaceable (at the module level) should a cell fail. I personally know of no failures. Surely there must have been some at some time but I have never found an owner with that experience. In fact, out here the Prius is still rare enough that owners go out of their way to chat when they meet. I have yet to find anyone who was less than enthusiastic and happy with theirs.
At year 2 and year 3 I got offers from my dealer to buy back our Prius at a fairly attractive sum so they could sell it at a massive markup to someone with the bug to buy who couldn't get one fast enough through channels. Both times I reminded the sales manager that my wife and I had concealed carry and would defend our Prius possession.
The OEM LRR tires only lasted 30,000 miles. My friend with the '05 gets his tires replaced under warranty as a part of the "deal" he got when he bought. He is over 100,000 now in 3 years and "in love" with his Prius. We have had ours going on 4 years and just had the 35,000 mile service. We get free oil changes as long as we own it. I will keep it as long as it is safe, reliable, effective, and economical. When a trade could be prompted on economic grounds I will switch to whatever is the best deal at the time considering the extant factors and my surmise of the future trends. I guessed pretty good this time. I waited 8 months to get it and it arrived in July '04. It was a good deal then and given the gas prices currently and their trend, it is becoming a better deal all the time.
The hybrid SUV's will not come close to my mileage but for a SUV the hybrids are darned good and will just get better as gas prices continue to climb.
Pat
"I'm not from your planet, monkey boy!"
Post Extras:
|
|
CJDave
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/21/02
|
|
Posts: 851
|
|
Loc: Southeast Iowa
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: Pat]
04/18/08 07:30 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
That is VERY interesting, Pat; I had NO IDEA hybrid vehicle technology had reached that stage! I love the open valve startup. One of the reasons that the older Caterpillar tractors lasted so long was that we cranked them with a two-cylinder gasoline starting engine, and cranked them with the VAVES OPEN. You could not FORCE a Cat owner by gunpoint to flip the valve-actuator lever to "RUN" before he saw oil pressure; we just DID NOT do that! The starting engine also warmed the water and the incoming air. There have been several applications where a motor other than a standard cranking motor (starter) was used to start an ICE. One was in a very early (we are talking EARLY TWENTIES here) Dodge automobile. The generator was twelve volt and was driven off the timing chain. They called them "silent starters" because there was no noisy ring gear. Those cars had a troublsome vacuum system that pumped the fuel from the rear-mounted fuel tank and when the system failed the owner simply drove home on the starter. Those Dodge starters were used for years and years to make handy winches for pulling stuff up onto trucks. Lincoln Electric Company built a two-cylinder portable welder that ran on gasoline, and which used the welder windings as a "silent" starter. I have a huge rubber cord here and a huge cord cap that is supposed to plug into a big 50A outlet. I should have that cord hanging out of the rear of my Jeep and then make a little decal that says: "Electric Drive Saves The Planet". That way I can cause a stir among the "green" folks.
CJDave
Post Extras:
|
|
egon
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/12/02
|
|
Posts: 3011
|
|
Loc: Nova Scotia,Canada
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: CJDave]
04/18/08 10:21 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
In reply to:
One of the reasons that the older Caterpillar tractors lasted so long was that we cranked them with a two-cylinder gasoline starting engine, and cranked them with the VAVES OPEN. You could not FORCE a Cat owner by gunpoint to flip the valve-actuator lever to "RUN" before he saw oil pressure;
Really! sounds a lot different from what I remember!
Post Extras:
|
|
Pat
|
|
Veteran Member
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/15/02
|
|
Posts: 4889
|
|
Loc: SouthCentral Oklahoma
|
|
Re: Fuel Efficient 4WD Vehicle
[re: CJDave]
04/19/08 11:51 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
|
|
Dave, I recall my dad telling me that some of the old cars, when first going with electric start, used the generator for a starter motor until cranking requirements grew with displacement and compression until a separate unit for each duty was a better idea. In the early days of carting, 12 volt generators were used as portable starting units.
My first few drives in a Prius had certain unsettling moments. Recall when you were a young driver and it was not that unusual for your cheap jalopy ride to die at a stop sign. Well the Prius usually switches the ICE off when you coast so at a stop the engine is dead and the vehicle is in eerie silence and with no vibration. Unsettling because you are trained to think the engine quitting is a bad thing. Of course as soon as you step on the "accelerator" (drive by wire acceleration demand input) you are telling the computer how much acceleration you want and it responds immediately with acceleration provided electrically and may start the ICE to assist or not depending on a few things the computer cares about.
Note the A/C is not parasite off the ICE but is driven by its own electric motor so it keeps its cool, and yours, when you are at a long light or watching a freight cross in front of you. If this depletes your energy reserve in the battery the ICE may kick in to spin the big MoGen and pump the batt back up. When I leave passengers in the car in summer to make a quick run into a shop, I leave the car "ON" and it runs the ICE a little every so often to keep the batt up and the A/C keeps everyone cool. Better than everyone having to trudge across a hot parking lot to get inside to stay cool. (I don't like to leave a "regular car" running parked for long.)
When tooling down the interstate on cruise control and you top a hill, going down the back side if coasting will maintain the set speed the engine is turned off. If coasting won't quite do it the ICE runs but the CVT effect is TALL GEARS.
There is a bar graph that shows near real time gas consumption (0-100MPG) and a bar graph showing the last 30 min of MPG in 6 each 5 min segments. As you top a hill and start down the other side you see the near real time MPG go way up even if the ICE is not switched off as it may not be contributing much. (Or it may be charging the battery and running harder than just enough to run the car downhill.) Then as you level out you see the MPG start to climb. On long downhill runs with the ICE off the battery gets charged pretty good as all the time the ICE is off and you are coasting the MG is biased on a bit to give the drag you would expect to feel in a standard gas vehicle.
Previously I said the Prius is listed with better EPA mileage in town than highway, the reverse of most cars. Most cars, in town, accelerate, drive a bit and then you hit the brakes to slow down or stop. All the energy consumed to get you going is now, less friction losses, converted into KE that is subsequently converted into heat in the brakes. With the Prius, the KE is converted to electricity to charge the battery unless you really get on the brakes hard. The brake pedal is an input to the computer to tell it how much you want to decelerate. IF that can be accomplished by biasing the MG to charge the batt then it does. If you ask for too much braking action then the computer adds in the friction brakes to help out as required. There are two immediate benefits: 1. if you don't brake hard a lot the friction brake wear parts last a long time and 2. yo get to recycle the energy of motion into electricity to use to get going again after you stop. This energy recycling is not 100% efficient as there are losses in the MG ==> batt and batt ==> MG but in a "regular car" there is ZERO recycling so the hybrid gets way ahead in the slow and go or stop and go of city driving.
At highway speeds the ICE has to provide the HP to overcome aerodynamic drag and various frictions. Then when you want a burst of acceleration to pass someone you make a withdrawal from your energy account stored in the battery. The ICE is a little 4 cyl thing. The Prius has a very low drag shape (Toyota spent lots of time in the wind tunnel.) The ICE can propel it well over 100MPH on a level road with no wind but at say 75-80 it doesn't have a huge reserve of torque and HP for passing going up a hill. Think of it like a standard flush toilet. It takes a while to fill the tank through that little tube but when you pull the handle there is a brief BLAST of water. The battery in the Prius will not support full acceleration for too long but will give you enough electric assist to be very safe merging onto the interstate, passing on a 2 lane, surprising the heck out of someone when the light turns green. If you are cruising along the battery is generally well charged and will give you a few minutes of hard acceleration, more than is ordinarily needed short of racing.
I refuse to drive a vehicle that is dangerously underpowered. I would not drive a Mercedes 240D (I say the D is for dog!) It just has not got sufficient acceleration to merge on the interstate or pass on a 2 lane. Our Mercedes 300TD (5 cylinder turbo diesel) met the minimums just fine. The Prius will totally smoke (euphemism only as the Prius is super low emissions and partial zero emissions rated) the 300TD off the line or at any normal cruise speed. My buddy with the '05 Prius drives from OKC to San Antonio to Seattle, to Pennsylvania in any order several times a year with his wife and sometimes grand daughter along and remains well satisfied. His previous car was a rather potent Mercury. He is a bit of a lead foot but still just loves the Prius. He gets about 40MPG and his wife gets 44-45 when she drives.
Hybrid SUV's will not do as good with MPG as the Prius but should still be way ahead of the regular ones.
Some Prius freaks have increased the battery capacity added plug in charging, and installed the electric only switch that prevents the ICE from starting up. (As is available on non USA Prius units) Short runs around the neighborhood can be accomplished with no engine running. I can not attest to the efficacy of these mods as the Prius was not designed to be an all electric vehicle but the guys that did it claim to be well served by the mods.
Oh, there is another down side to the Prius. In parking lots where speeds and acceleration is moderate the Prius often proceeds electrically only. This "STEALTH" mode requires you to be super vigilant as pedestrians do not hear you and just will abruptly step out in front of you as in these situations many folks detect close traffic by sound instead of looking. I have gently and briefly tapped my horn and had people nearly jump out of their skin in surprise as they had no idea as they walked along in the middle of the lane unaware a car was "dogging" them.
Oh, and one of the display modes on the dash mounted monitor is a cartoon of the car with colored arrows showing the flow of energy from the wheels to the batt or batt to wheels or engine through MG to batt or some combination of the above.
Pat
"I'm not from your planet, monkey boy!"
Edited by Pat (04/19/08 11:57 AM)
Post Extras:
|